The NYT Review of The White Tiger

The New York Times has come out with a mixed review of Booker-winning novel The White Tiger which we are reading now. Regular readers of this blog would know our skepticism towards outsourcing and the ambiguous nature of the “India Shining” and such like slogan which the media/film industry tries to thrust down our unwilling throats. We know that the truth lies elsewhere, but we go on as if believing it is what the future is all about.

“This grim world is far removed from the glossy images of Bollywood stars and technology entrepreneurs that have been displacing earlier (and equally clichéd) Indian stereotypes featuring yoga and spirituality. It is not a world that rich urban Indians like to see. Indeed, when Adiga’s book recently won the Man Booker Prize, some in India lambasted it as a Western conspiracy to deny the country’s economic progress. Yet Adiga isn’t impressed by such nationalistic fervor. In bare, unsentimental prose, he strips away the sheen of a self-congratulatory nation and reveals instead a country where the social compact is being stretched to the breaking point. There is much talk in this novel of revolution and insurrection: Balram even justifies his employer’s murder as an act of class warfare. Read the whole article.”

The review ends with, “There is an absence of human complexity in “The White Tiger,” not just in its characters but, more problematically, in its depiction of a nation that is in reality caught somewhere between Adiga’s vision and the shinier version he so clearly — and fittingly — derides. Lacking this more balanced perspective, the novel feels simplistic: an effective polemic, perhaps, but an incomplete portrait of a nation and a people grappling with the ambiguities of modernity.”

What “complexity” is the reviewer asking for? Perhaps the reviewer wanted a socio-economic and political treatise instead of a novel. A novelist can deal with two conflicting views as with Balram’s and his boss Ashok’s lives. If he were to try more than this we are sure it would make the book ineffective and confusing. Reading as we are Adiga’s novel, we can say he is unconventional in that he espouses a truth that is today only the preserve of a few activists and fearless writers with a slant towards the poor. If anyone reading this travels by un-airconditioned bus or train in India one can see the poverty of the people like Balram, the crushing hopelessness of the “Darkness” that Adiga talks about. But the ones who are members of the new economy who always live in air-conditioned “eggs” and revel in their lopsided and convenient assumption that India is progressing and shining will not even admit there is a dark side to their shining selves. While our television and films are perpetrating this glittering myth to the world; in the interiors of India which Adiga calls “Darkness,” people are being inducted into extremism of the worst kind – Naxalism, right extremism, and terrorism from across the borders.

Congrats Adiga for your achievement, your consistency of vision and the Booker, too, no mean achievement this!

This entry was posted in Arvind Adiga, Booker Prize, India, New York Times, outsourcing, The White Tiger. Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to The NYT Review of The White Tiger

  1. @lankr1ta says:

    Having read The White Tiger and the reviews, also the NYT Review, I am inclined to agree with the NYT. Adiga writes a good book- a gripping tale- a very real no feel good “India shining” story. But he makes it way too clever. Well apparently the literary device worked. Because he did win the Booker. But as characters- neither Balram Halwai nor anyone else for that matter are real people. They have a role to play and they play it. Where is the deeper analysis of jus why this is so. His observations on the rooster cage, the “darkness” are spot on, but as a reader I did not at all identify with anyone there. It is a very well written book- no doubt, but where is the identificaiton. You read it in the same kind o fascination as you would watch a dead body being dismembered. Not feeling much. Having read it, I am only glad I did not buy the book for myself. I really did not feel it worth the money. however, as a genre of writing, it is interesting- that word alone, I hope says it allWishing you and yours a very Merry Christmas!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s